Durham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Any error by trial counsel for failing to move to exclude the video portion of surveillance footage by an audio/visual recorder did not prejudice the defendant where the audio recording of the footage was admissible
• a defendant’s efforts to avoid capture may offer circumstantial evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lowe v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-22· cited 11×
• Sims v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-06-29· cited 10×
• Barstad v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-10-09· cited 7×
• Newby v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-12· cited 4×
• Joshua I.C. Weintraub v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-10-31

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Felix v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-10-18· cited 201×
• State v. Luke
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1974-09-24· cited 84×
• Allen v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-01-12· cited 65×
• Fetty v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-09-15· cited 52×
• Welbon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-09-13· cited 42×
• Evans v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-07· cited 25×
• Mathis v. State.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-03-07· cited 19×
• Younger v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-08· cited 17×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-01-26· cited 17×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-04-28· cited 9×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-08-11· cited 5×
• Collier v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-01-17· cited 5×
• Mims v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-04· cited 4×