Skip to main content
· 9/15/1870

Durham v. Goodwin

Citations

  • 54 Ill. 469

Syllabus

<p>1. Trespass—whether it mU lie. In an action of trespass, to recover damages for injury done to plaintiff’s crops, by reason of the horses and mules of defendant being breachy^and entering the plaintiff’s fields, and thereby letting others in not owned by him, it was held, the defendant was not liable, in that form of action, for injury occasioned by the stock not his own, unless they were, at the time, under his management and control.</p> <p>2. Instructions—should not assume facts to be proven. An instruction that assumes certain facts in the case to be proven, is erroneous.</p> <p>3. Same—error in instructions obviated by being qualified in another. If one party procures an erroneous instruction to be given, and, at the instance of the opposite party, another is given, qualifying the former, the two instructions should be considered together, and if, when so considered, the law is correctly laid down, the error in the first should be regarded as corrected. •</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is necessary upon request to advise the jury that the presumption of innocence prevails until the close of trial and that it is the jury’s duty to reconcile the evidence upon the theory of the defendant’s innocence if they can do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.