Durden v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “performance of the Psychiatric Review Technique may well have helped orient the ALJ with regard to the Listing 12.05 requirements”
• An IQ test in adulthood creates a rebuttable presumption of IQ before the age of 22
• “individual’s history of performing unskilled work does not necessarily refute finding that she had deficits in adaptive functioning.”
• “[T]here is no indication, at least from the definitions of adaptive functioning deficits of which this Court is aware, that adequate functioning in certain areas can somehow make up for deficits in other areas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).