Durbin v. Birmingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the presence of defenses unique to the named plaintiff also brings into question the adequacy of the named plaintiff.
• finding typicality is destroyed when “there is a danger that the absent class members will suffer if their representative is preoccupied with defenses unique to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).