Durbin v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no duty to defend because underlying action did not seek damages \from physical injury to tangible property\ per the policy, \but instead [sought] economic damages\
• holding no duty to defend because underlying action did not seek damages “from physical injury to tangible property” per the policy, “but instead [sought] economic damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).