Durant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1171(B) does not “cover[] the clandestine taking of photographs of a person who is in a public place” because criminal statute was limited to places where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• NEWLUN v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2015-04-16· cited 33×
• WASHBURNE v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2024-04-11· cited 4×
• In re Adoption of the 2012 Revisions to Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Criminal
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-08-07· cited 1×
• IN RE ADOPTION OF 2014 REVISIONS TO OKLAHOMA JURY INSTRUCTIONS
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2014-11-19
• United States v. Watkins
  Tenth Circuit· 2025-10-14

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Young
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-04-05· cited 62×
• State v. Duc Hong Pham Tran
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-10-19· cited 18×
• Gilbert v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-11-18· cited 12×