Skip to main content
· 12/20/1988

Durant v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 375 S.E.2d 396
  • 7 Va. App. 454
  • 5 Va. Law Rep. 1280
  • 1988 Va. App. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the child need not understand the meaning of the “oath,” but must recognize that she has a duty to tell the truth
  • holding that although a judge presiding in a jury trial determines a witness’s competency to testify, “the weight to be given to the evidence and a determination of the witness’s credibility are matters for the fact finder to decide”
  • holding that although a judge presiding in a jury trial determines a witness’s competency to testify, “the weight to be given to the evidence and a determination of the witness’s credibility are matters for the fact finder to decide”
  • holding that although a judge presiding in a jury trial determines a witness’s competency to testify, “the weight to be given to the evidence and a determination of the witness’s credibility are matters for the fact finder to decide”
  • trial court’s judgment as to competence of child witness will not be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error
  • trial court's judgment as to competence of child witness will not be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.