· 12/20/1988
Durant v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 375 S.E.2d 396
- 7 Va. App. 454
- 5 Va. Law Rep. 1280
- 1988 Va. App. LEXIS 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the child need not understand the meaning of the “oath,” but must recognize that she has a duty to tell the truth
- holding that although a judge presiding in a jury trial determines a witness’s competency to testify, “the weight to be given to the evidence and a determination of the witness’s credibility are matters for the fact finder to decide”
- holding that although a judge presiding in a jury trial determines a witness’s competency to testify, “the weight to be given to the evidence and a determination of the witness’s credibility are matters for the fact finder to decide”
- holding that although a judge presiding in a jury trial determines a witness’s competency to testify, “the weight to be given to the evidence and a determination of the witness’s credibility are matters for the fact finder to decide”
- trial court’s judgment as to competence of child witness will not be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error
- trial court's judgment as to competence of child witness will not be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hodges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.