· 8/25/2009
Durand v. HIMC CORP.
Citations
- 214 P.3d 189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the business judgment rule does not apply to corporate officers’ decisions that violate state law
- even as plaintiffs continued working and accepting lower wages, their requests or complaints raised sufficient issues of fact regarding whether they knowingly submitted to non-payment
- “[a]n employer's failure to pay wages due is 21 willful if the employer knows what he or she is doing [and] intends to do it”
- “[C]ompensation applies to more than work actually performed; it applies to any form of compensation that is a byproduct of the employment relationship.”
- finding percentage bonus guaranteed in contract wrongfully withheld
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.