Duran v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sanctioning a party in a divorce for failing to withdraw his case after settlement
• no diversity jurisdiction existed where plaintiff was a dual citizen of the United States and Germany and a resident of Germany when the complaint was filed
• “[D]iversity jurisdiction may be properly invoked only when a dual citizen’s domicile, and thus his citizenship, is in a state diverse from that of adverse parties.”
• “[D]iversity jurisdiction may be properly invoked only when a dual citizen’s domicile, and thus his citizenship, is in a state diverse from that of adverse parties.”
• “[A]lthough the Court is dismissing the action because it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it still retains ‘the power to determine collateral issues, such as the appropriateness of sanctions.’” (quoting Perpetual Secs., Inc. v. Tang, 290 F.3d 132, 141 (2d Cir. 2002)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).