Duran v. Carris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any ghostwriting of an otherwise pro se brief must be acknowledged by the signature of the attorney involved”
• holding “any ghostwriting of an otherwise pro se brief must be acknowledged by the signature of the attorney involved”
• collecting cases holding attorneys ghostwriting 4 briefs constitutes “misrepresentation to [the] court by litigant and attorney,” and on that ground 5 deny unrepresented plaintiffs a liberal standard
• affirming the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs RICO claim where the defendant engaged in a single scheme of conduct to accomplish a discrete goal directed at a finite group of individuals with no potential to extend to other persons or entities
• affirming the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs RICO claim where the defendant engaged in a single scheme of conduct to accomplish a discrete goal directed at a finite group of individuals with no potential to extend to other persons or entities
• “We determined that [the act of ghost-writing] as presented here constitutes a misrepresentation to this court by litigant and attorney”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).