Duran-Pichardo v. Attorney General of United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner “has no remedy because he has committed an aggravated felony”
• relying on estoppel to hold that a petitioner who “failed to invoke the very statutory and regulatory scheme that Congress enacted to address this type of delay,” could not thereafter “assert that he was deprived of due process of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).