Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Scandipharm, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a one day reactionary delay in filing a suit in Delaware is not enough to be considered a simultaneous filing
• finding that where a plaintiff seeks a declaration that a contract is invalid, that suit arises out of the same facts as an action seeking to enforce a contract
• “[T]he two complaints were filed within one business day of another . . . an indication of independent decision making”
• referring to equitable fraud as a “tort theor[y]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).