Skip to main content
· 8/25/1893

Dupuy v. Macleod

Citations

  • 4 Cal. Unrep. 147
  • 33 P. 1115
  • 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1010

Syllabus

<p>Statute of Frauds—Signature of Party to he Charged.—The fact that a contract for the sale of chattels is reduced to writing does not, under the statute of frauds, render necessary the signature of the party to he charged^ where the requirement of a writing was obviated by an immediate delivery of the goods sold.</p>

Judges: Searls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.