Dupree, N. v. Martin, K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “previous statement that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment analyses are ‘identical[,]’” as set forth in Lopez, “is no longer good law after the Supreme Court’s decision in Kingsley[.]”
• noting that the “previous statement that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment analyses are ‘identical[,]’” as set forth in Lopez v. LeMaster, 172 F.3d 756 (10th Cir. 1999), “is no longer good law after the Supreme Court's decision in Kingsley”
• “Graham’s analysis considered the impact of nonphysical coercion on consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).