Dupont-Lauren v. Schneider (USA), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee’s statement was too vague to constitute protected opposition activity where it did not apprize the employer of any practice viewed as discriminatory or accuse anyone at the employing company of engaging in discrimination
• collecting Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuit cases holding that “satisfactory but diminished evaluations do not constitute adverse employment actions giving rise to actionable retaliation claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).