Skip to main content
· 1/11/2005

Duplantis v. CADILLAC FAIRVIEW SHOP. CTR.

Citations

  • 894 So. 2d 393
  • 2005 WL 57316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiff's argument that defendant mall owners should have periodically inspected a handrail and holding that there was no evidence defendants should have known of a defect in it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walter J. Rothschild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.