Dupee v. Klaff's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a 13-month gap, while “substantial,” “is not too temporally disconnected to support an inference of retaliation” in a state-law retaliatory discharge claim
• finding explanation that plaintiff was being fired \because he 'had too many doctors appointments' \ to be direct evidence of retaliatory action
• finding explanation that plaintiff was being fired “because he had too many doctors appointments” to be direct evidence of retaliatory action
• finding sufficient causal connection despite thirteen-month lapse between the protected activity and the adverse action because the plaintiff had testified as “to other adverse conduct taken against him, including ridicule and harassment’
• 13-month gap not too temporally disconnected to support an inference of retaliation where there is other evidence of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).