Dunning v. Meaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in child-custody case that “[a]s long as the findings reasonably support the judgment, we will uphold the court’s decision”
• finding no changed circumstances because relocation was anticipated by parties at time of divorce
• agreement that change in circumstances could necessitate change to \the visitation schedule\ was not applicable to modification of parental rights and responsibilities
• agreement that change in circumstances could necessitate change to “the visitation schedule” was not applicable to modification of parental rights and responsibilities
• relocation alone “does not amount to a real, substantial or unanticipated change in circumstances justifying modification of the physical rights and responsibilities”
• as long as findings reasonably support judgment, family court's decision must be upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).