Dunnigan v. Syracuse Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the test for determining whether a claim is direct or derivative established in Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Del. 2004)
• adopting the Delaware Supreme Court’s test from Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031, 1035 (Del. 2004)
• adopting the Delaware Supreme Court's test from Tooley V. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031, 1035 (Del. 2004); see also Glenn v. Hoteltron Sys., Inc., 74 N.Y.2d 386, 392, 547 N.E.2d 71, 547 N.Y.S.2d 816 (1989
• adopting the test developed by the Delaware Supreme Court in Tooley
• “A plaintiff asserting a direct claim seeks redress for injury to him or herself individually.”
• “A plaintiff asserting a derivative claim seeks to recover for injury to the business entity. A plaintiff asserting a direct claim seeks redress for injury to him or herself individually.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).