Skip to main content
· 7/1/1881

Dunne v. Altschul

Citations

  • 57 Cal. 472

Syllabus

<p>Street Assessment—San Francisco — Patented Material.— The use of patented material in fulfilling a municipal contract for improving a street in San Francisco does not avoid an assessment thereunder, in a case where it is not shown that the contract either required or prohibited the use of patented materials.</p> <p>Id.—Id.—Id.—Presumption — Evidence__Assuming that the use of patented materials was unauthorized under such contract, the circumstance that materials marked as patented were used raises no presumption that they were patented, in a case where the superintendent of streets certifies that the work was properly done.</p>

Judges: McKee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.