Skip to main content
· 1/24/1979

Dunnam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 366 So. 2d 668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “if the provisions of an insurance policy conflict with the statute, the statutory provisions prevail and are incorporated into the policy”
  • plaintiff legally entitled to full recovery of amount of judgment in her favor before insurer entitled to subrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Sugg and Bowling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.