· 1/24/1979
Dunnam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 366 So. 2d 668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “if the provisions of an insurance policy conflict with the statute, the statutory provisions prevail and are incorporated into the policy”
- plaintiff legally entitled to full recovery of amount of judgment in her favor before insurer entitled to subrogation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patterson, Sugg and Bowling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.