Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 5/18/1994

Dunn v. Zimmerman

Citations

  • 69 Ohio St. 3d 304
  • 631 N.E.2d 1040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “General Assembly intended that a breach of fiduciary duty among partners is actionable at law” and that the normal remedy is an accounting
  • such independent claims may be grounds for an accounting or an accounting can be conducted on dissolution
  • and concluding an accounting is usually a prerequisite to an action at law that arises from the affairs of a partnership
  • suit may be maintained prior to accounting if an accounting would be futile or the claim is for breach of a fiduciary duty or wrongful appropriation of property
  • common-law rule prevails in most states, requiring partnership accounting before action at law
  • “Partners in Ohio owe a fiduciary duty to one another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Dunn v. Zimmerman

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.