· 11/27/2002
Dunn v. Wharton
Citations
- 852 So. 2d 113
- 2002 Ala. LEXIS 347
- 2002 WL 31664451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- case decided under prior Rule 9; although not in compliance with Rule 9(d), the abstract was sufficient to determine the issue on appeal
- although not in compliance with Rule 9(d), the abstract was sufficient to determine the issue on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Harwood, Houston, Johnstone, Lyons, Moore, See, Stuart, Woodall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.