Dunn v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the exception applies to adult step-children as well as all foster children
• recognizing that the exception applies to adult step-children as well as all foster children
• recognizing that the exception applies to adult step-children as well as all foster children
• interpreting the phrase to include foster children, in the paramount interest of protecting children
• interpreting the “child of either” language in California’s exception to the marital privilege
• seeing “no reason to exclude foster children 17 from [the definition of ‘a child of . . . either’], as it is consistent with the general 18 legislative intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).