Skip to main content

Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.

Citations

  • 745 N.W.2d 549
  • 2008 Minn. LEXIS 116
  • 2008 WL 598243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]f the answers to special verdict questions can be reconciled on any theory, the verdict will not be disturbed.” (quotation omitted)
  • stating “the general rule in Minnesota is that ‘attorney fees are not recoverable in litigation unless there is a specific contract permitting or a statute authorizing such recovery’” (citation omitted)
  • “[A]ppellate courts may not ‘sit as factfinders,’ and are ‘not empowered to make or modify findings of fact.’ ” (citations omitted)
  • “[A]ppellate courts may not ‘sit as factfinders,’ and are ‘not empowered to make or modify findings of fact.’ ” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.