Dunn v. Moto Photo, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]t is for the court to determine, in the first instance, whether the defendant’s conduct may reasonably be regarded as so extreme and outrageous as to permit recovery....”
• telling customer that sexually explicit photographs could not be developed while actually developing and sharing such photographs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).