Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring court to give clear and unambiguous statutory language its plain meaning unless doing so would lead to absurd results
• requiring court to give clear and unambiguous statutory language its plain meaning unless doing so would lead to absurd results
• explaining how conflicting provisions in Article 18, Sections 6 and 8 of our Constitution “work together”
• “The workers’ compensation laws should be construed with a view toward advancing the purpose of placing the burden of injury and death upon industry.”
• “The workers’ compensation laws should be construed with a view toward advancing the purpose of placing the burden of injury and death upon industry.”
• “We must construe the statute to avoid irrational results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).