Dunn v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It has been found expressly that the enforcement of the restrictions would ‘not be injurious to the public interests’ ”
• \It has been found expressly that the enforcement of the restrictions would `not be injurious to the public interests'\
• construction restriction is “a property right in the person in favor of whose estate it runs or to which it is appurtenant”; restrictions are “real estate,” “part and parcel of the land to which they are attached and with which they pass by conveyance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).