Dunn v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding certificate of analysis properly admitted when appellant did not offer evidence to rebut the Commonwealth’s proof of chain of custody
• no break in the chain of custody where the evidence was transferred between laboratories
• “Code § 19.2-187 permits the Commonwealth to introduce into evidence at trial a certificate of analysis ‘of a person performing an analysis or examination, performed in any laboratory operated by . . . the Division of Forensic Science.’”
• the judgment of a trial court is presumed correct on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).