Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when the court had overruled an objection that had been properly raised and passed on by the court, seeking a mistrial on that same basis would be futile
• noting that where a trial judge has fair opportunity to consider and rule upon an issue, it is not incumbent upon counsel \to harass the judge by parading the issue before [the trial judge] again\
• noting that where a trial judge has fair opportunity to consider and rule upon an issue, it is not incumbent upon counsel \to harass the judge by parading the issue before [the trial judge] again\
• holding a request that a voir dire question regarding insurance coverage “not be charged” was sufficient to preserve the issue, because even though specific grounds were not stated, the grounds were patent because the voir dire question was so inherently prejudicial
• holding a request that a voir dire question regarding insurance coverage “not be charged” was sufficient to preserve the issue, because even though specific grounds were not stated, the grounds were patent because the voir dire question was so inherently prejudicial
• stating “[t]he decision of whether or not to allow a witness to testify who was not previously listed on answers to interrogatories rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).