Skip to main content
· 3/10/1923

Dunn v. Arbuckle

Citations

  • 113 Kan. 169
  • 213 P. 655
  • 1923 Kan. LEXIS 357

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Action — Misjoinder oj Causes of Action. Several plaintiffs brought an action and complained that each was induced to buy stock in a corporation by fraudulent representations, and asked for the cancellation of their individual subscriptions and the return of the money which each had paid for the stock, and it appeared that the sales were distinct and separate transactions made at different times and by different defendants under varying circumstances, to the different plaintiffs, and where the causes of action, although somewhat similar in’kind, do not affect all the parties, iheld, that the plaintiffs may not unite the several causes of action in the same petition.</p>

Judges: Hopkins, Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.