Dunlop Holdings Limited v. Ram Golf Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the anticipating use does not have to disclose the nature of the invention in order to invalidate the patent
• invalidating Dun-lop’s Harrison patent due to Metropolitan’s prior use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).