Dunlea v. Dappen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issue of when plaintiff discov ered, or reasonably should have discovered, that plaintiff was injured is a question of fact for the jury
• holding that “[a] post-answer Rule 12(b)(6) motion is untimely and some other vehicle ... must be used to challenge the failure to state a claim for relief’ (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that the determination of when a woman discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, for statute of limitations purposes, that she was psychologically injured by childhood sexual assaults was a question of fact for the jury
• treating the defendant’s “motion to dismiss,” filed after the defendant had filed an answer to the complaint, as a motion for judgment on the pleadings
• describing the elements of the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress
• describing the elements of the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).