Dunlap v. Wild

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party who consented to arbitration proceedings was estopped from challenging their validity to avoid collateral estoppel effect of arbitrator’s decision
• holding that a purchaser of securities, who was unhappy with an arbitration award he won against a stock brokerage firm, was precluded by collateral estoppel from raising the same issues in a suit against the firm's salesman
• permitting the defense of collateral estoppel to bar a WSSA action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).