Skip to main content
· 1/11/1967

Dunlap v. Warmack-Fitts Steel Co.

Citations

  • 370 F.2d 876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under these circumstances, we consider the original claim in itself adequate ‘written description’ of the claimed invention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Matthes, Mehaffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.