Skip to main content
· 3/21/2008

Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Citations

  • 519 F.3d 626
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5898
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,149
  • 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1538
  • 2008 WL 746217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a prima facie case of discrimination requires the plaintiff show that he was “treated differently than comparable employees outside of the protected class” (emphasis added)
  • “scores were altered to produce a racially biased result”
  • plaintiff relied on both theories to establish discrimination
  • plaintiff relied on both theories to establish discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Sutton, Oberdorfer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.