Dunlap v. Spilka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• joinder of different defendants charged with participation in separate phases of a single conspiracy proper
• “The Government ought not be allowed, by having' its principle witness speak to the grand jury through the voice of another, to deprive a defendant of his right to impeach by contradiction.”
• where a witness affirms triith of a prior statement it is evidence in chief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).