Skip to main content
· 1/2/1915

Dunlap v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.

Citations

  • 247 Pa. 230
  • 93 A. 276
  • 1915 Pa. LEXIS 812

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Personal injuries — Excessive damages — Refusal of new trial — Appeals—Act of May 20,1891, P. L. 101.</p> <p>The exceptional power conferred upon an appellate court by the Act of May 20, 1891, P. L. 101, to reverse the action of the lower court refusing a new trial, where it is alleged that the verdict was excessive, will be exercised only in cases of clear abuse of judicial discretion.</p>

Judges: Elkin, Moschziskbr, Pell, Potter, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.