Dunlap v. Northeastern Railroad
Citations
- 130 U.S. 649
- 9 S. Ct. 647
- 32 L. Ed. 1058
- 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1785
Syllabus
<p>When, in an action brought by an employé of a railroad company to recover damages for injuries caused by the negligence of other employés, the defence Of contributory negligence is set up, the plaintiff is entitled to have the question submitted to the jury unless no recovery could be had upon any view which could be properly taken of thq facts which the evidence tended to establish.</p> <p>This court will not, by a technical construction of an obscure record, preclude itself from correcting an error committed in- the trial below, if a construction can be given to it which will give jurisdiction.</p>
Judges: Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court· 1925-01-05· cited 208×
- Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LowerySixth Circuit· 1896-05-12· cited 108×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1890-04-14· cited 56×
- Davidson Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1907-03-25· cited 54×
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1933-05-19· cited 37×
- New York, N. H. & H. R. v. VizvariSecond Circuit· 1913-12-18· cited 30×
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. EverettSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 27×
- Kunkel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-04-29· cited 24×
- Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. HoweSixth Circuit· 1911-11-07· cited 23×
- Chicago & E. R. v. PonnSixth Circuit· 1911-11-07· cited 19×
- McCarthy v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Second Circuit· 1917-02-06· cited 15×
- Shank v. Great Shoshone & Twin Falls Water Power Co.Ninth Circuit· 1913-06-12· cited 14×
- In re the Will of NotleyHawaii Supreme Court· 1904-03-08· cited 13×
- Neininger v. CowanFourth Circuit· 1900-05-01· cited 13×
- Huntt v. McNameeFourth Circuit· 1905-11-09· cited 13×
- Bryce v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina· 1903-04-01· cited 11×
- Chapman v. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co.Fourth Circuit· 1898-11-01· cited 10×
- Fitchburg R. v. NicholsFirst Circuit· 1898-02-11· cited 7×
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PattonFifth Circuit· 1894-04-10· cited 6×
- Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. HealyEighth Circuit· 1898-03-21· cited 6×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.