Skip to main content
· 10/5/1891

Dunlap v. Linton

Citations

  • 144 Pa. 335
  • 22 A. 819
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 617

Syllabus

<p>Because, in trespass by a father for the seduction of his daughter, the cause of action is the seduction, and not the resulting lying-in expenses, the support of the daughter, and the mental pain she may have sustained, the action is barred when six years have elapsed after the seduction was accomplished.</p>

Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.