Dunlap v. Dunlap

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The donation being for [the donees’] advantage, they will be deemed to have accepted it, unless the contrary appears.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fiske v. Lawton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1913-12-19· cited 47×
• Holmes v. McDonald
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1899-03-23· cited 37×
• Imboden v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1905-02-21· cited 37×
• Robertson v. O'Neill
  Washington Supreme Court· 1912-02-02· cited 34×
• Ess v. Griffith
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1897-05-25· cited 34×
• White v. Watts
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1902-12-18· cited 31×
• Kyle v. Kyle
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1916-04-10· cited 20×
• Graham v. Suddeth
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1911-01-16· cited 19×
• Harris v. Harris's Estate
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1909-05-17· cited 18×
• O'Connor v. McCabe
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-03-07· cited 9×
• Harper v. Corcoran
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1911-07-05· cited 7×
• Bangs v. Browne
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1907-09-20· cited 6×
• Peninsular Savings Bank v. Wineman
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1900-03-06· cited 5×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bostwick v. Mahaffy
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1882-04-25· cited 16×
• Preston v. Sonora Lodge
  California Supreme Court· 1870-07-01· cited 10×
• Beardslee v. Reeves
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1889-10-18· cited 9×