Skip to main content
· 9/15/1852

Dunlap v. Brette

Citations

  • 8 La. Ann. 479

Syllabus

<p>Plaintiff charged an indebtedness on the part of defendant for advances, as would appear by vouchers, from No. 1 to 12, that would be produced on the trial. On the trial, a contract was oifered in evidence, to the admission of which a bill of exceptions was taken. Held—the evidence was properly admitted. The defendant might have craved oyer of the vouchers, of which the contract was one—and having filed his answer without doing so, the presumption is, he knew what they were.</p>

Judges: Rost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.