· 4/26/1999
Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Taseski
Citations
- 47 F. Supp. 2d 867
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6715
- 1999 WL 288272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding when Fifth Amendment privilege claimed, litigant is barred from introducing other evidence on that issue
- precluding defendants from introducing evidence on an issue where the defendants asserted the Fifth Amendment
- barring defendant from introducing testimony or other evidence in support of his version of the damages amount because he invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to answer any questions regarding the issue during his deposition
- “Defendants . . . are precluded from offering evidence on the topic of damages due to their invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gadola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.