Skip to main content
· 4/26/1999

Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Taseski

Citations

  • 47 F. Supp. 2d 867
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6715
  • 1999 WL 288272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding when Fifth Amendment privilege claimed, litigant is barred from introducing other evidence on that issue
  • precluding defendants from introducing evidence on an issue where the defendants asserted the Fifth Amendment
  • barring defendant from introducing testimony or other evidence in support of his version of the damages amount because he invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to answer any questions regarding the issue during his deposition
  • “Defendants . . . are precluded from offering evidence on the topic of damages due to their invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gadola

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.