Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC v. CDDC Acquisition Co. (In Re FPSDA I, LLC)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “there is not a substantial ground for difference of opinion as to whether [§ 365(d)(4)] is applicable” to a similar franchise-bound lease
• discussing two ways to characterize these arrangements, but concluding that the choice of characterization doesn’t affect whether § 365(d)(4)’s time limit applies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).