· 8/30/1996
Dunk v. Ford Motor Co.
Citations
- 48 Cal. App. 4th 1794
- 56 Cal. Rptr. 2d 483
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6628
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 10799
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 831
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the prevailing industry practice of rounding up the billing minutes and finding that reasonable customers should have expected this
- “The award of attorney fees based on a percentage of a ‘common fund’ recovery is of questionable validity in California.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.