Duniway v. Portland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the admissions “effectively eliminate[d] a merits determination” 14 as to the plaintiff’s First Amendment and due process claims
• holding, without further analysis, that the district court did not abuse its discretion by granting the Rule 36(b
• affirming decision to permit withdrawal where motion to withdraw was made before trial and plaintiff would not be hindered in presenting evidence to the factfinder
• finding no abuse of discretion to allow withdrawal of admissions where admissions would 13 effectively eliminate a merits determination
• holding, without further analysis, that the district court did not abuse its discretion by granting the Rule 36(b) motion to withdraw deemed admissions because the motion was made before trial and the nonmoving party would not have been hindered in presenting its evidence
• affirming district court’s decision to permit withdrawal where motion to withdraw was made before trial and plaintiff would not be hindered in presenting evidence to the factfinder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).