Skip to main content
· 2/26/1996

Dunham v. Chase

Citations

  • 674 A.2d 1279
  • 165 Vt. 543
  • 1996 Vt. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that negligent entrustment claim is barred by the exclusivity provision, even though claim involves a higher level of culpability than negligent supervision
  • concluding that the claims that the officer negligently hired, trained, and supervised the co-employee who injured the plaintiff alleged nothing more than a breach of the employer’s duty to maintain a safe workplace
  • “the exclusivity provision bars any claim against an employer short of intentional injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, C.J., and Gibson, Dooley, Morse and Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.