Dunham-Buckley & Co. v. Halberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[C]oncerns reflecting aesthetic or recreational interests have been recognized as 'judicially cognizable injur[ies] in fact.'\ (second alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).