Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Minn.Stat.Anno. §§ 514.01 and 514.05 which is in relevant language and structure essentially the same as G.S. 44A-8 and 44A-10
• finding “no rational distinction” between the services of an architect and an engineer under mechanic’s lien statute
• interpreting Minn. Stat. Anno. § 514.01 and 514.05 which is in relevant language and structure essentially the same as G.S. 44A-8 and 44A-10
• finding “no rational distinction” between the services of an architect and an engineer under mechanic’s lien statute
• as against an owner, a lien may attach for material not actually used on the premises
• “owner” under mechanics’ lien statute does not require proof of absolute ownership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).