Dungan v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff was entitled to jury instruction “that the original tortfeasor was liable for damages caused by subsequent improper medical treatment which aggravates or increases the original injury”
• finding trial court reversibly erred in admitting testimony that plaintiff received inappropriate medical treatment for injuries sustained in an automobile accident
• finding trial court reversibly erred in admitting testimony that plaintiff received inappropriate medical treatment for injuries sustained in an automobile accident
• determining “ ‘reasonableness or necessity’ can be established by lay testimony ... involving] a question of necessity from the perspective of the injured party, rather than from the perspective of a medical expert”
• involving post-damage award review of admissibility of evidence that certain treatment was unnecessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).